NativeLingo
Log inAdd to Chrome
← Back to blog
MethodUpdated Sep 20, 20267 min read

Why NativeLingo swaps only one word in a hundred

More swaps look like more learning. On a real page they turn reading into decoding, and people switch the extension off. Here's the research we used to set the number.

Dmitry Ratner
CEO of NativeLingo
XReddit
In short
  • To read without a dictionary, you need to know about 98% of the words on the page.
  • So NativeLingo aims for 1 swap per 100 words, and never goes past 2.
  • Seeing a word isn't the same as remembering it. A short typed review covers the gap.

The 98% line

Hu and Nation (2000) gave readers the same short story with different shares of unfamiliar words. Understanding held up near the top and fell apart quickly as unknown words piled up. Their estimate, repeated by Nation in 2006: comfortable reading takes about 98% known words.

Two unknown words in a hundred is already the edge. That's roughly one per paragraph. Here's what the difference looks like:

1 in 100 · NativeLingo
The train was late again, so I walked to the estación and waited with everyone else, reading the news on my phone.
1 in 5 · too many
The tren was late otra vez, so I caminé to the estación and esperé with everyone else, reading the noticias on my móvil.

Why not more?

Early versions of NativeLingo swapped far more, up to one word in five. It looks great in a screenshot. On a real page you stop reading and start decoding, and a week later the extension is off.

So the limits live in the extension itself, not in a setting you can crank up:

Share of words swapped on a page
Aim 1%, never over 2%
In a single paragraph
No more than 5%
The same word
Once a page, twice a day
Stops appearing
After 10 meetings, or once you know it
Comes back
When you miss it in review
Want to see what 1% feels like?
Install NativeLingo and open any long article.
Add to Chrome

Seeing isn't knowing

Pellicer-Sánchez and Schmitt (2010) followed words through a novel. After ten or more meetings, 84% of readers recognised a word's meaning. Only 55% could recall it on their own.

Recognise the meaning84%
Recall it on your own55%

After 10+ encounters in a novel. Pellicer-Sánchez & Schmitt, 2010.

That gap is why there's a review. Karpicke and Roediger (2008) found that once you've recalled something, rereading it adds almost nothing a week later, while testing yourself keeps about 80%. So the review asks you to type the word instead of tapping “I knew it”.

The page shows you the word. The review is where you learn it.

What to expect

Two or three highlighted words in a long article. None on some short pages. That's normal.

Pick a daily goal you can keep. Five new words a day turns into 7–10 minutes of review a day after a year. Twenty turns into 30–40. Most people should start with five.

Which words would you see?
The level test takes three minutes.
Take the level test

Questions

Sources
Hu & Nation (2000), Reading in a Foreign Language 13(1). Nation (2006), Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1).
Pellicer-Sánchez & Schmitt (2010), Reading in a Foreign Language 22(1).
Karpicke & Roediger (2008), Science 319.

Read next

type it: ventana
Method · 3 min read

Active recall beats tapping “I knew it”, and the research agrees

dos libro → dos libros
Languages · 2 min read

“Dos libro” teaches you a mistake you will repeat for years

5 · 10 · 20 a day
Study tips · 2 min read

How many new words a day? What 5, 10 or 20 cost after a year

Your next article could have three new words in it.

Add to Chrome